DOTS

ERED

Environmental Residue-Effects Database

US Army Corps of Engineers ERDC Dredging Operations Technical Support

USACE


Field Name Description
% Effect   The magnitude of the effect (e.g., % mortality; change in weight; change in length; percent hatch; etc.). 
Analyte   The chemical substance used to create the exposure.  
CAS   CAS registry number is a unique numerical identifier assigned by Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) to a chemical substance.  
COLL  Where the animal was obtained: C (cultured-reared in laboratory); W (collected from wild); N/I (No Information); N/R (Not Reported). 
Comments  Commonly supports the effects data. 
Common name  Common name of the test animal. 
Control   The control response for the observed effect (e.g., survival, growth, reproduction; etc.). 
Dose  The frequency with which the contaminant was applied during the test. 
Duration   The duration of the exposure period: hr (hours); d (days) wk (weeks), mo (months), yr (years). 
Effect   The type of toxicological effect observed in the test animal (e.g., survival, growth, reproduction). 
ERED ID  Unique identification number autogenerated by database. 
ExpConc  The exposure concentration and units. 
Fraction   The test animal tissue used to determine tissue residue (e.g., whole body, soft tissue, liver, etc.). 
Genus Species   Scientific name of the test animal. 
Media  Type of water used to test animal: FW (freshwater); SW (saltwater) 
Mix   Whether the analyte was tested as part of a mixture of analytes or individually: yes (part of mixture), no (single), or N/I (No information). 
Risk   Summary of the risk (e.g., ED, NOED, LOED) an analyte might pose to the test animal. Previously, many risk numbers were assigned to results. Going forward ERED will not report a risk number unless it is reported in the study.  
Route   The route by which the analyte was intended to enter the body: aquatic; diet; injection. 
Signif   Whether the effect was significantly different, usually compared to the control for laboratory studies: Yes (significant); No (not significant). 
Source  Reference from which data was obtained. 
Spiked  Whether the analyte was spiked into the route (aquatic, diet, sediment, injection): yes (analyte spiked), no (analyte not spiked) 
ST  Study type: L (Lab); F (Field); L/F (Lab/Field); Meso (Mesocosm); Micro (Microcosm); N/I (No Information). 
Stage   Life stage of the test animal (e.g., egg, larval, juvenile, adult). 
Tissue ww (mg/kg)   Tissue residue of analyte in the test animal tissue (mg/kg wet weight). 
Trend   The trend of the effect, usually compared to the control for laboratory studies: INC (increase); DEC (decrease), NEF (No effect). 

You are viewing Arthropoda: Invert (insects, crustaceans) and Silver

Genus Species ERED ID ST Common Stage COLL Analyte CAS MX SPK H2O Route CONC Dose DUR Residue
mg/kg ww		 Fraction Effect Trend Signif % Effect Control Risk Comments Source
Acartia tonsa 19902 L copepod adult W Silver 7440-22-4 N Y SW diet N/I 1x 1 wk 0.034 whole body reproduction NEF N 116 100 N/R no effect on egg production Hook and Fisher. 2002. Relating the reproductive toxicity of fi.... Mar Environ Res 53:161-174.
Acartia tonsa 19903 L copepod adult W Silver 7440-22-4 N Y SW diet N/I 1x 1 wk 0.064 whole body reproduction DEC Y 64 100 N/R decreased egg production Hook and Fisher. 2002. Relating the reproductive toxicity of fi.... Mar Environ Res 53:161-174.
Acartia tonsa 19904 L copepod adult W Silver 7440-22-4 N Y SW diet N/I 1x 1 wk 0.13 whole body reproduction DEC Y 72 100 N/R decreased egg production Hook and Fisher. 2002. Relating the reproductive toxicity of fi.... Mar Environ Res 53:161-174.
Acartia tonsa 19905 L copepod adult W Silver 7440-22-4 N Y SW diet N/I 1x 1 wk 0.32 whole body reproduction DEC Y 59 100 N/R decreased egg production Hook and Fisher. 2002. Relating the reproductive toxicity of fi.... Mar Environ Res 53:161-174.
Acartia tonsa 19924 L copepod adult W Silver 7440-22-4 N Y SW diet N/I 1x 1 wk 0.064 whole body reproduction DEC Y 50% N/R LR 50 50% reduction in egg production Hook and Fisher. 2002. Relating the reproductive toxicity of fi.... Mar Environ Res 53:161-174.
Acartia tonsa 9443 L copepod adult N/I Silver 7440-22-4 N N/I SW diet 77 nmol/g N/I N/I 0.033 whole body reproduction N/I N/I N/I N/I ED 31 hatch rate Hook and Fisher. 2001. Sublethal effects of silver in zooplankt.... Environ Toxicol Chem 20:568-574.
Acartia tonsa 9444 L copepod adult N/I Silver 7440-22-4 N N/I SW diet 193 nmol/g N/I N/I 0.074 whole body reproduction N/I N/I N/I N/I ED 50 hatch rate Hook and Fisher. 2001. Sublethal effects of silver in zooplankt.... Environ Toxicol Chem 20:568-574.
Acartia tonsa 9445 L copepod adult N/I Silver 7440-22-4 N N/I SW diet 193 nmol/g N/I N/I 0.074 whole body reproduction N/I N/I N/I N/I ED 42 developed Ovaries Hook and Fisher. 2001. Sublethal effects of silver in zooplankt.... Environ Toxicol Chem 20:568-574.
Acartia tonsa 9446 L copepod adult N/I Silver 7440-22-4 N N/I SW diet 39 nmol/g N/I N/I 0.019 whole body reproduction N/I N/I N/I N/I ED 78 Protien Per Egg Hook and Fisher. 2001. Sublethal effects of silver in zooplankt.... Environ Toxicol Chem 20:568-574.
Acartia tonsa 9447 L copepod adult N/I Silver 7440-22-4 N N/I SW diet 77 nmol/g N/I N/I 0.033 whole body reproduction N/I N/I N/I N/I ED 56 Protien Per Egg Hook and Fisher. 2001. Sublethal effects of silver in zooplankt.... Environ Toxicol Chem 20:568-574.
Acartia tonsa 9448 L copepod adult N/I Silver 7440-22-4 N N/I SW diet 39 nmol/g N/I N/I 0.019 whole body reproduction N/I N/I N/I N/I ED 68 developed Ovaries Hook and Fisher. 2001. Sublethal effects of silver in zooplankt.... Environ Toxicol Chem 20:568-574.